You are here
Grace Community School
Current Positions Available: (Click on the position to view the full job description)
Grace Community School, a Christ-centered, coeducational, K-12 school located in the beautiful piney woods of East Texas and well-recognized as one of the top schools, private or public, in its part of the state, is looking for the next great High School Principal to provide mission-centered vision and leadership to a high school family that is passionate about redemptive community, educational sanctification and “life as worship.”
Ever wonder what it would be like to work at Grace Community School? How has Grace been able to accomplish so much? What does the culture have to be to keep improving? It’s hard to describe, but here are a few thoughts about what the culture at Grace is currently, and what we’re striving for. In a nutshell, our faculty strives for nothing less than exceptional. If you think a career in exceptional might be how you’d like spend your working hours, then contact us for employment opportunities that may be available for you.
School culture is both internal and external. As Stephen Gessner has said,
Internal culture is less explicit, more felt than articulated, and functions through implicit understandings, underlying and taken-for-granted beliefs, worldviews, unspoken priorities, and shared assumptions. Organizational culture is like the proverbial iceberg: what is seen and apparent- the external, explicit, and overt aspects- make up a small part of the whole. Below the surface are the internal, implicit, and covert aspects of culture, which can be much stronger and more influential. Leaders need to understand these different aspects of culture and how they have a crucial and critical role in influencing, changing, and maintaining their organization’s culture.
Gessner, S. “Leadership and Culture: Lessons Learned from Bear Stearns”. Message given at the ERB 81st Annual Conference, October 22-24, 2008.
The following is an attempt to identify and set forth many (if not all) of the major components by which we lead and make decisions at Grace Community School.
1. Problem-solving is primarily relational, rather than policy-driven.
It is very important to have policies in place to provide structure, guidance, and consistency. Nonetheless, policy is not and cannot be the sole driving force of decision-making in a community of grace like GCS. Therefore, we will typically deal with major disciplinary problems and difficult issues through personal relationships and solutions that take into mind the individual situation and needs of the student, family, or staff member.
Decisions will inevitably be more messy and complex than would reference to hard-and-fast, bright line standards; however, God looks at and tends to work with the heart of the individual believer, and so should we. We will listen carefully, try to get as much information as possible, bathe the decision or solution in prayer, and apply God’s Word and wisdom given by Him to the particular situation.
This does not mean that we will ignore or discount policies and processes; they are important to providing structure and guidance. It simply means that we will not be policy-driven where doing so would work an injustice or fail to model biblical grace, wisdom, and mercy. At times, this will result in criticism from those who don’t have all the facts that we are acting inconsistently or arbitrarily. We are leaky vessels, and despite prayerful efforts, will sometimes get it wrong. At the end of the day, however, we must make decisions that reflect God’s character, and give the Holy Spirit a chance to work in the situation.
Roland Barth identifies the importance of trust within a school’s culture:
The nature of relationships among the adults within a school has a greater influence on the character and quality of that school and on student accomplishment than anything else. If the relationships between administrators and teachers are trusting, generous, helpful, and cooperative, then the relationships between teachers and students, between students and students, and between teachers and parents are likely to be trusting, generous, helpful and cooperative. If, on the other hand, relationships between administrators and teachers are fearful, competitive, suspicious, and corrosive, then these qualities will disseminate throughout the school community.
Barth, R. “Improving Relationships Within the Schoolhouse”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 63, No. 6 (March 2006), p. 9.
Our first inclination is to trust people to do the right thing, to act as a follower of Christ and as a professional. When dealing with families, we will strive to treat them with love, as brothers and sisters in Christ. This means appealing to the presence of the Holy Spirit in everyone, rather than jumping to conclusions that those with whom we deal are operating from foolish or impure motives (while, of course, allowing for the reality that most of us operate from mixed motives most of the time, and completely impure motives sometimes).
Our faculty, staff and administrators are called by God to serve at GCS, and we will believe that they will step up and perform at a level and with a heart that glorifies God and represents GCS well. This also means that we will quickly forgive when those within the community fail to live up to those standards, and to seek forgiveness quickly when we fail. Finally, it means that we will tend to support ideas and requests from faculty and staff (professional development, resource requests) with minimal “red tape” or bureaucracy whenever possible, trusting that providing them with resources will allow us to become better than we once were.
3. Empowerment and support.
Everyone called to leadership at GCS has, by gifting, experience, and education, developed areas of competency that are unique and essential for their particular area of influence. Those called to leadership were so called because of their abilities as intrinsically motivated self-starters.
We will assume that these people know their area of influence better than those at other levels in the school. This means that we will recognize and respect the unique leadership roles of each member of the various leadership teams within the school. My role, and that of other leaders within the organization, is to equip and empower their team members, and let them lead. I will not micromanage, nor will others within the leadership structure.
We will expect them to use good, prayerful judgment and initiative, and we will support them in their decisions. We will understand and respect the fact that those closest to the decision are usually those best able and equipped to decide what to do; typically, we will make decisions based upon the best judgment of that person. There are many different ways to do a task or accomplish a goal well, and we will not quibble with the means by which the task or goal was completed, even if it is different from the way we would have done it (so long as the means are consistent with godly character).
4. A Body of Christ Approach to Leadership.
We believe in a shared governance approach to leadership that is consistent with the model Christ gave us through the Body. No leader’s role is more important than any others; this includes the Headmaster.
There is no hierarchy of importance on the Leadership Team, or in any other teams. We all bring complementary gifts, talents, and perspectives to the table, and we all need each other to carry out the mission, vision, and core values of the school. “Protecting one’s turf,” or “operating as silos or fiefdoms” is not welcome at GCS.
All of the members of the Leadership Team, and all of their teams, should feel free to raise ideas, suggestions, and innovations regarding any area of the school. They should feel free, and have the responsibility, to lovingly and appropriately but honestly critique or make recommendations that impact any area of the school. Once a team makes a decision, we all stand behind it.
In short, there’s no place for silent dissent before a decision is made, and no place for vocal dissent after one is made. We must be willing to submit to the other members in their respective areas of expertise when appropriate, and to communicate with respect and gentleness when decisions have implications that impact other members of the team and their areas of responsibility. While engaging and inviting the perspectives of others may run the risk of looking like indecisiveness, leaders at GCS are willing to take that risk in order to give as many stakeholders as possible a “seat at the table.”
5. Grass Roots Idea Formation and Implementation.
We have a bias towards letting team members and others throughout the Grace Community develop and implement new ideas that will result in the overall betterment of the school. Whenever possible, we will give teachers and administrators the green light to explore, design, and implement new ideas and innovations (the learning differences program at the elementary school, developing the Toastmasters program, our current drop schedule, the Praying Parents of Grace, Cougar Backers, the Drum Line, Spirit Squad, and one-act play festival are notable examples).
When anyone within the community has an idea they would like to implement, leaders should tend to be an advocate and to say “yes”, unless there are strong reasons not to do so. At Grace, it doesn’t really matter where a good idea comes from, if it’s good. This “grass roots”, as opposed to “top down”, environment encourages the pursuit of excellence, becoming better than we once were.